“In America, during the early 1970s, the Vietnam war was brought to an end by a massive bombing campaign within the United States. The anti war movement felt it had run out of peaceful options, and began bombing banks, recruitment offices, and police stations. Very few people were killed by the bombs, but the property damage and loss of services, were enough to force the administration to bring an end to the war."
He continued, "There was very little that could be done without starting a civil war within the American population. The government at the time would have had to escalate the infiltration, and visibly hunt down the people placing bombs. Focus groups, at the time, found that most Americans would not accept the full scale disruption of anti war groups. There was too much distrust of the government over the expansion of the war in Vietnam. There was a good chance we would have lost control of the general population. So the decision was made to end the war.
I told him, “I don’t remember anything about large scale bombing, just the weather underground, but they blew themselves up.”
He said, “You don’t remember this because, we effectively erased it from history, simply by not talking about it. We led people to believe that peaceful protests ended the war, or that it became too costly. We dismissed the bombings as a failed attempt by a few radicals who killed themselves. We could not allow people to understand that it was the bombing, which was most effective at ending the war. We were on the brink losing control to a global revolution. Our studies showed that any civil war in America would lead to a cascade effect around the world. Other countries would have supplied arms and money to the American revolutionaries. Many other governments would have been overthrown in favor of socialist and communist regimes. We could not let people realize the effects of the bombings, because it would make them too powerful. If they knew, it would be used again later. They would continue bombing until they brought an end to our society.”
“Instead of directly attacking the radicals, we used infiltrators to disrupt their groups and relationships. Along with television and newspapers, which ridiculed their tactics and described them as ineffective, we turned them against each other socially. We used this internal conflict as an example of how they were disorganized and combative. We encouraged people to turn in family members only to the degree that it would cause conflict within their families, if such topics were discussed. This lead to the radicals feeling isolated and alone. Isolating radicals is a tactic we have used ever since to keep the social order. After the government was barred from infiltrating radical groups, we set up corporations specifically to infiltrate groups, isolate radical people, and eject them from their communities and support networks. These Private security corporations have kept up surveillance and disruption of dissenters, ever since. They use the latest tools and have access to military intelligence and social media platforms.”
“Now, with tools like Google and Facebook, it has become much easier. We know all about people. What they want, what they desire. Who they are connected to. We know where they go, who they talk to, what they believe in. We flag them when they move into troubling beliefs, practices, or friendships. We know when people are becoming radicalized before they do. We know who can be compromised to use as an infiltrator, and we know to target those who will stand their ground.”
“We can easily place information in the hands of an individuals friends or relatives to pressure them to change their plans or beliefs. If that’s not an option or fails to work, we can isolate them without anyone knowing. We can hide any positive feedback others offer, and direct negative feedback their way until they feel ashamed of their beliefs and practices. We can make it impossible to find work or housing. Once a person becomes homeless, there is too much stress on their survival. They become ineffective at doing just about anything.”
“We know what people are searching for and can alter the results to suit our needs. We can make people believe anything we want, feel anything we want. We can make them or break them both internally and socially.”
“When it becomes necessary, we can insert fake friends that will push and influence them, either to passivity or prison. If all else fails, we can send in an operative specifically designed to their desires. The operative will work with them until they are broken and alone, in prison, or suicide. There is no need for physical threats or violence anymore.”
Projects: